Just posted this at BradBlog - will they delete it?

I posted the following over at BradBlog. I want to see the reaction. I suspect they will simply delete it.

Well, the reasons for the media acting as they do are obvious - according to a friend of this blog - Z. It's because of Jews.

Z is a good friend of Big Dan, and this blog's moderator, Agent99.

According to these people - participants at Bradblog - the reasons the media is how it is, is Jewish control:

Z wrote: They [Jews] only control 96 % of the world media - propaganda machine.

Only when they own 100%,.. then should we begin to worry.

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

The power of lies, deceptions and disinformation as Americans pay the price of collective stupidity.

Should any minority be allowed to wield such awesome power?

Facts of Jewish Media Control

...Eisner a Jew....Joe Roth (also a Jew).... Steven Bornstein, a Jew.....Gerald Levin, is a Jew. Goldberg and Hersch are Jews. ....Norman Pearlstine, a Jew....a number of Jews....Palinsky, a Jew.....the other Jews at CBS......Jewish newsman Daniel Schorr.....Jewish Laurence Tisch.....Murray Rothstein, a Jew......Jewess Sherry Lansing.....

the facts of Jewish media control in America.


http://bigdanblogger.blogspot.com/2009/05/big-dans-big-news-may-27-2009.html#212402

Seeing as these people are friends of Bradblog - one of them the moderator - I'd like to ask if Brad Friedman repudiates such nonesense......or whether he accepts it as "true".

What's the answer, Brad? What do you think of your own moderator endorsing such beliefs?

Link


Second post:

plunger - another friend of Bradblog, Z, BigDan and the moderator of BradBlog Agent99 keeps claiming the same thing:

On October 3, 2001, I.A.P. News reported that according to Israel Radio (in Hebrew) Kol Yisrael an acrimonious argument erupted during the Israeli cabinet weekly session last week between Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon and his foreign Minister Shimon Peres. Peres warned Sharon that refusing to heed incessant American requests for a cease-fire with the Palestinians would endanger Israeli interests and “turn the US against us. “Sharon reportedly yelled at Peres, saying “don’t worry about American pressure, we the Jewish people control America.”

http://seminal.firedoglake.com/diary/3820#comment-30930

That's a well known manufactured quote......from a palestinian islamic faction.

But it's more evidence that the people around BradBlog actually think being Jewish is the major determining factor in all the things Brad writes about - media bias, election fraud, etc.

Does Brad know of, and approve of such anti-semitism amomgst his colleagues (and his own moderator)?

Let's see what they say? My bet is they will delete it.

I'm finding the Sibel Edmonds thing interesting at the moment. Interesting to see it hit the rails at the first effort at trying to verify it - Shakowsky claims her mother died a decade earlier than Sibel claimed, that she'd never owned a townhouse as Sibel claimed, that she'd never had a tryst with any woman as Sibel claimed she had.

Shakowsky's responses accuse the purveyors of the allegations as being cut from the same cloth as the Birthers - part of a right-wing smear campaign to oppose a liberal congresswoman. Hmmm. Well, that much might be true.

---------

Update: Comments have been deleted.

[ed note: Comment from banned commenter deleted. --99]

How did they know I was a "banned commenter"? It is now more difficult to post the same issue, because BradBlog will put the post into their comment analyser, and automatically refuse it.

Gotta love the accountability of the "alternative news" crew.......and their refusal to stoop to censorship, of course. That's what makes them so different from the (Jooo-ish) mainstream, of course.

Good for you Bradblog - deleting comments accusing your moderator and audience of anti-semitism. Way to go.

------

I reposted them with slight differences to escape the auto-comment analyser.

I added:

What is Bradblog doing with people like this? Why is someone with such anti-semitic views as these moderating Bradblog?

ETA - I didn't put a timeframe. My comments were deleted within hours.

WTC 7 - Falling Forwards (Not Symmetrical, Not 'into its own footprint')

I love Tanya

It's not the way you walk............

It's all about the sex.

Me love ya boom wuk.

----------

Nobody seems to like this as much as I do. I can't hear it enough.

Wow - Deluxe Edition of Catch a Fire FLAC

Catch A Fire (Deluxe Edition) FLAC

Wow - the bass and drums are so much tighter. The improvement in clarity generally is quite astonishing. I've never heard such an improvement in a remastering of something.

Concerns Grow For Charlie Sheen's Mental Health

Sheen is suffering from delusions of grandeur?

Or maybe that's just Prisonplanet's spin. Poor guy. The way Prisonplanet report it, Sheen seems to imagine he is some super-powerful alien force, having descended from the stars:

Actor Charlie Sheen has followed up on his “20 Minutes With The President” letter by directly addressing President Obama in a You Tube clip to request he use his executive power to reopen the investigation into 9/11 and its aftermath.

Sorry, but who put Charlie Sheen in charge?

It's amusing how Prisonplanet (and Sheen) seem to have imagined it makes so much more difference that a Hollywood actor should say something. Everyone has to sit up and listen now Martin Sheen says something? I find that hilarious.

Seemingly Prisonplanet made out beforehand that there was some major event happening - it turned out to be Martin Sheen's YouTube plea to Obama? LOL

The whole notion that this malarkey was some massive event is laughable. I'm sure I don't find it so especially ridiculous simply because I have such disdain for Hollywood. Though that's part of it. Feed your dog Charlie Sheen's Chunks. Get active - start posting links to Sheen's YouTube plea to the President.

YouTube plea to the President? That should do it? It normally does, right? haha

Mr President, Charlie Sheen's been on YouTube!!!

Comments are open at Prion-central again although all comments are being moderated. Well, all mine are. :)



ETA several posts by Bandwidth Issues deleted. But they seem to be allowing me to post atm. They'll perhaps be deleted in a few hours. Sometimes they let posts stand, other times they delete the oddest things.

I post silliness at Prisonplanet sometimes, just to see what they allow and what they delete. It's confounding. :D

Rivero's Inconsistency Part 34

Here's Rivero's comments over Israel's demand for sanctions against Iran:

Netanyahu knows, beyond a shadow of a doubt, that he is not going to get the level of punitive sanctions he wants from the UN, because Russia and China will veto.

The UN will, again, as happened with Iraq, become "irrelevant". At the end of the day, the US will have been "groomed" for some military confrontation against Iran, possibly by some kind of false flag event, and we'll be off and running in yet another military misadventure.

And remember, before the US "neutralized" Iraq through military intervention, Iraq was considered to be Israel's primary existential threat, accused of having weapons of mass destruction.

We know that was a lie.

Taking the statements I have added emphasis to:

1 - Russia and China will veto.

American use of veto to protect Israel is always condemned by Rivero et al. Perhaps rightly so, but leaving aside the issues.... we see that Russian and Chinese vetos are not condemned - even though they would presumably be employing their vetoes to protect their own interests as much as any American vetoes are given to protect American interests. (Does China have a UN mandate for its action in Tibet? Wouldn't China veto any action against its interests if it were proposed? Surely it would?)

If Chinese, Russian and French vetoes are to be respected, what about those of the USA? Are the validity of such vetoes to be based entirely on one's personal opinion of the situations involved? Fair enough - but that's a matter of opinion and the use of veto shows a difference of opinion (and interests). What's the answer - abandon all vetoes? (As if ultra-nationalists like Rivero would accept it! They generally oppose the UN in principle anyway as it's part of the "globalist NWO" conspiracy for world government. Unless, of course, it's useful to their propaganda - such as over Israel, or Iraq wherein the UN becomes a legitimate and ultimate authority.)

2 - "before the US "neutralized" Iraq through military intervention, Iraq was considered to be Israel's primary existential threat, accused of having weapons of mass destruction.

We know that was a lie."

So why does Rivero so often suggest Israel manipulated America into attacking Iraq so as to protect and serve Israel? If Iraq really was not a threat, and this was well-known to Israel and America, then it cannot be claimed that it served Israel's interests to manipulate America into attacking Iraq. Why would Israel have bothered to instigate 911 as a prelude to attacking Iraq when it already knew Iraq had no WMDs and hence posed no existential threat?

An Illustration of Fascist Method

This is from WhatReallyHappened - it's a quote by Michael Rivero. He's speaking about public distrust of the vaccine against swine-flu, but it points to the wider purpose of WhatReallyHappened, and the rest of the crypto-fascist movement ie to undermine the legitimacy of democratic government (the other major aspect is promoting the idea of (jewish) world conspiracy)

There is a fundamental truth underneath the issue of the vaccine.

The popular revolt against government-mandated shots reveals a basic lack of trust in government by the people.

A government that has lost the trust of the people is a government which can no longer function.

And a government that cannot function and that cannot be trusted is a government that is useless and a waste of money.

The US Federal government has outlived its usefulness to the people.

And waving flu or terrorists or Iranians at us will not create the illusion that continuing to support such a useless government is necessary.

The point of such stories about flu vaccines etc is to create a sense of crisis. (There's never any good news at conspiracy websites - there's never any news which contradicts their worldview.)

This operates alongside an effort to create a sense of government illegitimacy - the role served by the election fraud meme, for example. Another factor, of course, is the definition of an enemy - internal and external - jews.

That's a simple description of the method of all these conspiracy websites, but one that fits with history of Weimar and rise to power of Nazism. The history of Weimar and its fall is a lesson unlikely to be forgotten by fascists. Why wouldn't they see it as an archetype worthy of an attempt at repetition?

Furthermore, statements like Rivero's above invariably reveal that the conspiracist conception of reality views the creation of false realities as an enormously powerful method: why wouldn't they employ the same methods themselves? Obviously it isn't beyond their ken to even dream of it, as their entire worldview is based around it.

Indeed, the history of the John Birch Society reveals that whilst the Birchers communicated a fear of a communist conspiracy, they were themselves engaged in a conspiracy to defeat it - whether the communist conspiracy existed or not, the Birchers certainly did, and had themselves formed secret networks, passed around 'secret' texts, worked undemocratically and unaccountably to pursue their own agenda etc. ie the exact same things they'd formed to oppose.