Monday, 30 November 2009

WRH asks "James Von Brunn: Crazed killer or American hero?" (!)

The link Rivero provides leads to John Kaminski's homepage, not the story itself.

Unsurprisingly the essay promotes Von Brunn as an "American Hero" for his homicidal attack on the Washington Holocaust Museum. The essence of the argument is a reiteration of Von Brunn's own claims which are a miasma of anti-semitism and far-right conspiracy theories targeting the Federal Reserve, international Marxism and (of course) world Jewry as the principal causes of America's "woe".

The usual Rivero rubbish then........

But even for Rivero, promoting Von Brunn as "an American hero" is just a bit strong, isn't it? And whilst Rivero claims he isn't anti-semitic, he's 'just a critic of Israel' apparently, the fact remains he promotes the most extreme anti-semitism in the work of others - to the point of calling Von Brunn "an American hero".

Here's some of what the article Rivero is promoting actually says:
.....if you are acting on principle alone with no friends at your back, you often wind up being declared a “lone nut” by those who don’t have the courage to comprehend your ideas about justice, honesty, and who is doing what to whom, and you wind up alone and bleeding, your sharp tongue finally silenced, never to feel the warm hand of a friend again in this life.

In this world, such is the frequent consequence of acting on principle.

James Von Brunn had attacked.....the two central influences responsible for the rapid destruction of the American republic: the Federal Reserve and the Holocaust Museum.

....more knowledgeable [people] are more likely to include [Von Brunn] in a category that includes the famous patriot Patrick Henry, who said “Give me liberty, or give me death!”, or Eugene Debs, a presidential candidate who was put in jail during World War I for saying that war was bad.

James Von Brunn spent his entire life searching for the truth as he saw it, and as he learned it. Very early on he spotted the Jewish financial hammerlock that appeared, to him, to be turning the world into a pornographic quagmire. He spent much of the rest of his life trying to convince anyone who would listen of the dangers we all were not seeing, and how our lives were being degraded and destroyed by this network of financial vampires.

.....Here was a great opportunity for the lockstep Jewish media to really go off about a white supremacist Jew hater shooting up a Holocaust Museum. I mean, is the movie version already in production, or what?

Only one answer fits. Von Brunn was too hot to handle. He was so on point that there was no debating him. He had the goods, and Jewish media didn’t want people to hear that. That’s why they’ve made all these laws prohibiting hate speech, so no one may question the Jewish lies that are imposed on us as their utterly deleterious fabricated rendition of reality.

[Von Brunn wrote:]....Through manipulation, bribery, slander, assassination, and control of the mass media, JEWS contrived to pit nation against nation, race against race, financing all sides in the resultant wars; then at exorbitant interest rates financing reconstruction of the devastated countries. Rothschild's modus operandi has kept Western Civilization in a continuous state of war and eternally in debt.

“In 1981 America's future seemed dismal indeed. It seemed to me that IF the FED could be brought to center stage and exposed, the entire Illuminati structure would collapse. Enraged citizens would hang the International Bankers. America would resume its role as a bastion of Western Culture.”

....JEWRY was politically invisible to the West, and its war against the West was always subterranean, cunning and deceptive. JEWISH strategy was to infiltrate the institutions of Western Culture and destroy them. JEWRY'S primary weapon was money manipulation and USURY.”

“JEWS have no religious scruples regarding money where goyim are concerned. They now have the means to carry out their war of annihilation of the West. They would not surface as a fighting unit and openly attack their hated enemy. They remained invisible. Their strategy was to organize the entire JEWISH People into a Fifth Column whose purpose is to penetrate the West and destroy everything.

No doubt a conspiracy exists to create One World Marxist Government at the sacrifice of America's sovereignty. Just as certain, One World ideologists of all stripes are financed by the International Banking Cabal, in which the Federal Reserve System (FED) plays a major role.
So, there we have it: Rivero is touting an acknowledged "white supremacist jew hater" as "an American hero".

Rivero is clearly engaged in the same sort of subterfuge and LIES that BigDan'sBigBlog and many others exhibit - to claim they themselves are not anti-semitic even as they promote authors and works which really are, obviously, anti-semitic. Rivero and the others are facing both ways. How can one sustain denials of anti-semitism whilst promoting Von Brunn as an American hero? Especially when the reasons claimed for Von brunn's heroism are his preparedness to act homicidally against "the world jewish conspiracy"! Von brunn isn't a supposed hero because of violence against Israel or Zionism - but against "the world jewish conspiracy". 'Jew' is the disinction used - nothing else.

Here's Rivero claiming he doesn't hate jews:
I am not "anti-Jewish"....... The truth is that I don't hate the Jewish people.
Rivero doesn't "hate jews" yet promotes claims that "a white supremacist jew-hater" is "an American hero" for attempting homicide justified on the grounds he was acting against "the world jewish conspiracy".

In this bizarro world of Rivero and Kaminski, what exactly would constitute anti-semitism if Von Brunn's views and actions don't?

And how come Von Brunn found his political home amongst the white supremacist far-right.......and is touted as a hero by Rivero and Kaminski for his homicidal attack on the Holocaust Museum.......yet Rivero can still himself avoid the labels of being anti-semitic, far-right and an ultra/white nationalist? How come Von Brunn was familiar and known to Eustace Mullins, Willis Carto's Liberty Lobby, Stromfront, VNN, etc etc - all far-right people and places which Rivero also promotes and whose anti-semitic conspiracy theories Rivero shares - and yet Rivero can still claim Von Brunn is an "american hero" whilst claiming he himself isn't any of the things Von Brunn stood for? How come?

I mean, what exactly is it that makes Von Brunn "an American hero" for Rivero and Kaminski if not the homicidal attack on what they believe is "the jewish world conspiracy"? And what is the notion of "a jewish/marxist world conspiracy" if not anti-semitic, racist, Hitlerite hogwash? How can Rivero etc call Von Brunn a hero and share his worldview yet still expect to somehow escape the charge of anti-semitism? He must think his readers are idiots........(they are?)

Laughably Rivero claims:
...you will not find anything inside my site that talks about Jewish anything.

LINK

5 comments:

socrates said...

This exhibits Rivero's fundamental legitimation crisis in a nutshell. It also puts Alex Jones in the same camp despite his even better methods of hiding complicity with Joo haters. I like you. I agree with a lot of what you post. But if you were in bed with Curtis Maynard and Willis Carto, I'd be out of town. Thus, can't Alex Jones be said to be as anti-semitic as Rivero? Mike's on his show every month. Rivero links to anti-semites. That makes Michael Rivero one too despite any way he thinks he can spin it otherwise. Moulitsas, for example, praises the CIA. He says it is a liberal institution he'd have no trouble working for. That makes Markos Moulitsas Zuniga of Daily Kos a right winger on the wrong side of history. These buggers want to have their cake and eat it too or something like that. I think you know what I mean. Kos cannot claim to be a progressive. Rivero cannot claim he isn't an anti-semite.

ernie1241 said...

Background on extreme right connections of James W. Von Brunn:
http://ernie1241.googlepages.com/vonbrunn

the_last_name_left said...

Thanks for the link ernie. And thanks for doing the work to put all that together. It's a great resource you have there.

Re-reading that Von Brunn page it's startling to imagine how people could seriously mistake Von Brunn as anything other than a jew-hating far-rightist. But an "american hero"!? Only Von Brunn's fellow-travellers could make such a "mistake".

Astonishing too to see the same stuff recurring through nearly 100 years of American paranoia - and more astonishing to see the same rubbish repeated now, especially alongside denials over the provenance of it all ie from the far-right, fascism, organised racism, anti-communism etc.

Laid out as you have it, it is hard not to see the characters involved as representing a sort of contagious mental illness - a self-replicating meme which is almost entirely self-referential.

I suspect the people whom have already succumbed to this mental illness are lost to us - there's no bringing them back. But hopefully, armed with information such as you have presented, the illness can be innoculated against.

Much thanks.

socrates said...

That's an excellent job by Ernie. It just shows that we are all getting the job done through creating pockets of awareness.

One thing I think I am very good at is connecting dots. Sometimes they are pure. Other times they lie in that Zunes critique zone of spatial proximity or whatever he said. I think Al Giordano's claims of McCarthyits tactics crosses the line. He's basically saying we can never make any connections. It's ultimately for the reader to decide. We know what's up with the blogosphere at this point.

My sleep patterns are all messed up of late. I'm not sure why I keep pounding away at the keyboard day after day. Maybe I just don't like to quit. I don't think it all boils down to an internet addiction. I believe I have made discoveries, important ones.

But no man or woman is an island. Meeting TLNL has been a godsend. He is the only person on the net I am in contact with who understands what the proverbial they did to me. This is not paranoia. It happened to him to, albeit apparently to a lesser extent. He got banned from more than one place after being called out as being me. And why, because we share some common ideas? It was the Unofficial WRH forum where it started. That place was part and parcel of Rivero. They housed his letters. I believe he got pinned as being me, not sure, at Rigorous Intuition. The final stop I am sure of he got the "socrates" tag was at BradBlog.

Oops, almost forgot Tinoire's Progressive Independent. What all those places have in common are these sophists who blab about not being anti-semitic, who talk about zionism and Jews, that kind of thing.

What I'm doing here right now is referred to as meta. Just shooting the shite in a sort of refecting way about the milieu.

So check this out. On one of the recent Green Report threads at BradBlog, someone named Phil and another bloke started talking about chemtrails and HAARP. I was like wtf, oh no, not again. Can I not lurk without the trepidation of hearing some more bullshite tossed around about my anonymous username. Anyway, it was a false alarm, as I wasn't mentioned. But here's where it got a bit twilight zone-ish. Agent99, who we have looked into before as having ties to the anti-semitism, she is Brad's moderator, she belted out the word crikey. Like wtf for real. That is a lingo from Wales, from TLNL. Was it a coincidence she used that word? I realise there is no way to ever know. I don't use the word. I do write with the European spellings for the most part, the S in place of the zed, but I used to live in Ireland. I used to read a lot. I absorbed the culture. I just find it hard to believe that someone from the west coast, an American, would say crikey. And for it to show up after a few posts talking about "chemtrails" and HAARP, well folks should know what I mean. It didn't unnerve me. Let me wrap up this post and maybe people will see where I'm headed with this.

(continued)

socrates said...

There are all these historical forms of disinfo that have been around even before the Joos Control the World one appeared to saturate the internet. There are the John Birchers. Lyndon LaRouche. I'm sure there's other things, the stuff Ernie and TLNL know much more about than me. I am saying that I feel in my gut that this Joos thing is part and parcel of deliberately placed disinformation. I know there is truly anti-semitism. I wish it didn't exist. But in regards to the internet, I can't help but wonder whether a lot of it is insincere, as in psychological operations. I mean, this guy Rivero, I don't actually think he even believes most of what he writes and speaks of. I can't prove that. It's how I feel. And I'm not crazy. I'm not paranoid. I'm not even what could be referred to as a conspiracy theorist. Back in the day, if I had continued, I would have become a social theorist. That's what I am. C. Wright Mills spoke of a sociological imagination. He said the social sciences are not like math or science. We need to get a feel for social reality, for cultures and whatnot, and put it together ourselves. In other words, Sociology is not an exact science. History tries to be, but even there, it can never match up to the hard sciences in accuracy. It can come close.

To think like Mills is to see that the conspiracy is not to be found in individuals like Rivero, Agent99, Tinoire, Alex Jones et al, though they could very well be part of a disinformation racket for whatever purposes. Mills would say the conspiracy is to be found in the institutions. I believe that. There is something fundamentally wrong with out societies that allows the convolution to have its desired effect. Enigmas and confusion abound. It's been a humble desire of mine to help offer some clarity to a focked up world, so perhaps we can all move forward with hope, morality, and strength to do the right things. Sure, I probably sound like I'm on a high horse or that I just had a huge bong hit, but I mean what I write and with sincerity. I like people. I like writing. I like clarity. It's a never ending battle, but it is one we must not ever give up on trying to win. Maybe it was a coincidence that Agent99 said crikey. I don't think so. I think some people are simply sadisticfools who take great pleasure in spreading pain and confusion.