Tuesday, 10 January 2012

Reading Burt Blumert's Fucking Awful Book

His book (I'm loathe to use the word) is an abomination. My god! Read it!

Burt writes,

"Frankly, it’s not easy to watch inferior people degrading Ron Paul from one TV channel to the next. "

Notice that easy use of 'inferior'?

There's a lot that is revolting about this book.

Read it only if you dare!!!

Everything about it is weird. He mentions his wife's views but I feel certain he has just invented them, substituting his own. He mentions a supposed media-friend's analysis and it seems obvious he's just making it up - to say exactly what he wants to say himself. God, it's AWFUL. No more, please......make it stop....!!!

26 comments:

Real Truth Online said...

I read parts of it---sounds awesome to me! Naturally you call it revolting but don't explain WHY or actually REFUTE anything he says.

Brilliant reporting!

It's revolting just because you SAY it is, BRILLIANT work!

Real Truth Online said...

Oh and by the way, you used the word "fucking" in your post title.

I thought profanity offended you??

Hmmmm????? I guess it only "offends" you when I use it in my posts inserted within impossible to refute facts that you avoid like the plague---only to deduct that profanity offends you so that you can avoid answering/refuting my comments----then you go back to using profanity yourself. LOL

the_last_name_left said...

fucking idiot

Real Truth Online said...

"fucking idiot"

EXCELLENT, EXCELLENT refutation of my post exposing the fact that you REFUSE to refute that book!!

EXCELLENT!

Care to actually REFUTE it? That means you post portions of the book and you actually provide PROOF that it's lies. Gonna do that??

Real Truth Online said...

Oh by the way, you used the word "fucking" again. But yet profanity offends you huh? I would have been DELETED for saying that.

Real Truth Online said...

It only "offends" you when it's inserted within posts in which I annihilate you with facts you cant refute, so you use the profanity shit as a diversion.

Do I paint an accurate picture?

Yes I believe I do.

the_last_name_left said...

Interesting that you think a book has to be "lies" before it can be called "fucking awful".

There's a bit more to it than that. To say the least.

But you realise nothing of it. Oh well.

Real Truth Online said...

That's not the point asshole. If you criticize a book that you are supposedly saying is wrong or not true or revolting, it is your JOB to tell people why you claim it's the opposite, and tell people WHY it's wrong, WHY it's not true and WHY it's revolting. That's not rocket science.

In your post, NOTHING you said was based on FACT. You said:

"Everything about it is weird. He mentions his wife's views but I feel certain he has just invented them, substituting his own. He mentions a supposed media-friend's analysis and it seems obvious he's just making it up - to say exactly what he wants to say himself. God, it's AWFUL. No more, please......make it stop....!!!"

Notice the phrases you used to described his content. You said:

1. "I FEEL CERTAIN he just invented..." [your personal feeling]

2. "IT SEEMS OBVIOUS he's just making it up." [your personal feeling]

In other words, you have NO FACTUAL basis to call his book "revolting" because even you ADMIT it's based on your PERSONAL FEELINGS, not TRUTH.

DICKHEAD.

socrates said...

Larry, apparently you are David Dees.

I stumbled across this yesterday.

Link

Sorry, not sure how they got that from the national wingnut appreciation thread.

And TLNL, in my new blog entry in the acknowledgements, I gave thanks to you, bro.

Real Truth Online said...

Ive seen that page before. Im not David Dees dickhead. The pictures on the link you sent shows ME, but thats not Dees. Some fucknut got his jollies by putting MY pictures on a site saying Im Dees. Hmmm..maybe it's the same guy that made the Ron Paul newsletters and posted Ron Paul's name on it and said HE wrote them? Maybe?

Anyway, here is a picture of the REAL David Dees. At the bottom of the page on this link

http://www.adl.org/
main_Extremism/
David_Dees.htm

the_last_name_left said...

ha, yeah - I posted it before. Larry as nazi Dees. lol.

Bravo on the court results S! Brilliant!

@larry - I qualified my opinion with "in my opinion" and "i believe" etc.

If you think the book is "good", rather than the vile swamp-shit it obviously is, then good for you.

socrates said...

Thanks, TLNL. These are heady days, and my only fear now is I might jinx myself. Thank God I'm not a paranoid Foooker like Larry.

By the way, we should try to match him up with a boyfriend. That's probably why he constantly has his panties all bunched up. Maybe he has some sort of bipolar problem. Larry, seriously, find yourself a good shrink.

Real Truth Online said...

"@larry - I qualified my opinion with "in my opinion" and "i believe" etc."

You have the right to your OPINION, but until you REFUTE it and say WHHHYYYYYYY you think it'shit, then it's just an OPINION-----not FACT that it's shit. I thought you was interested in FACTS????? NO???

Get it now????

Real Truth Online said...

Yeah Socrates, that link you sent me has a link to YOUR website!!! And YOU mention it???

Hmmmmmm. I smell a rat.

Socrates, you can be a fucknut all you want, and keep sucking TLNL's cock all you want, since you constantly support this asshat when i CONSTANTLY crush him with FACTS. Just look at this thread alone! You support his stance that he calls a book revolting when he has not ONE FACT listed to back it up, and you two care about FACTS??

I thought it was just the 9-11 stuff that you don't require facts for---turns out, it's anything really. He calls the book shit and not once says WHY, and doesnt refute anything---and you remain loyal to him.

You two must be the biggest fags on Earth.

Real Truth Online said...

TLNL: The book is shit

ME: Why?

TLNL: I said so

ME: But WHY???

TLNL: I said so.

ME: BUT WHHHHYYYYYYYYY?????

TLNL: I said so. I don't need reasons or facts, just my opinions will do...and my opinions are all I need to label something "shit". End of story.

Kinda sounds like EVERYONE of our 9-11 discussions, doesnt it????

LOL

Real Truth Online said...

"Thank God I'm not a paranoid Foooker like Larry."

Nahhhh, but you believe in chemtrails and a JFK conspiracy! Nahhh, not paranoid at all. You don't believe in conspiracies EXCEPT when you do. If you believe a conspiracy, it's VALID. If you don't, then the ones who do are "kooks", right? What a fucknut.

LOL. Im pissing my pants.

socrates said...

Larry, keep it up. You are finally being entertaining for a troll. Yet, I don't get why you keep calling myself and TLNL cigarettes.

the_last_name_left said...

bipolar? Larry's a mono-pole, a monomaniac.

socrates said...

You're right. He's absolutely batshit, fricking anti-social. He's got serious anger issues. And th think I edited something on him at my blog, because he wouldn't stop whining, and I felt bad for him.

Larry certainly sounds like he could go nuts. Unfortunately TLNL, Maryland is a part of the country very similar to wingnut states like Utah, Arizona, and Texas. The people there tend to be very fried and anything but laid back. Granted Larry is some hybrid of that with having a 24/7 conspiracy theory freak going on. He is so deluded, he can't distinguish between what is plausible from what is not.

If I had to guess, he is exhibiting signs of schizophrenia to go with his inner demon of latent homosexuality. He's got a lot of baggage.

Real Truth Online said...

"Larry certainly sounds like he could go nuts. Unfortunately TLNL, Maryland is a part of the country very similar to wingnut states like Utah, Arizona, and Texas. The people there tend to be very fried and anything but laid back. Granted Larry is some hybrid of that with having a 24/7 conspiracy theory freak going on. He is so deluded, he can't distinguish between what is plausible from what is not."

"He's absolutely batshit, fricking anti-social. He's got serious anger issues."

LOL, yet you support The Last Buttfucker Left, who constantly ignores questions, deletes comments, and makes claims that books are shit while giving ZERO proof and not refuting one word of it. Wanna re-think who's batshit crazy??

Real Truth Online said...

And keep in mind, this is a guy who constantly claims he hates profanity [of course, we all know that's just to avoid my questions] and the very next day, he will post a story like this one...with the word "FUCKING" in the title!

And he claims he hates Hitler while at the same time admitting that the Jews would have been COMMITTING A CRIME if they had resisted and fought back to save their lives!

That takes the fucking "loony bin" award!!

100% batshit crazy! Not to mention colossal fraud! And you support this fucknut, Socrates!!

Real Truth Online said...

Usually those who respond to criticism with nothing but ad hominem attacks, with ZERO substance, are the ones who are exhibiting mental issues.

Now, do you two needledicks care to respond to my posts with any substance?? Or will it be just to name call and that's IT?

I dont mind a little name-calling, but when it's warranted and not free of substance in the post. Provide substance AND ad hominem attacks---that would be an improvement.

Real Truth Online said...

Odd, I went to socrates' other blog...this one:

http://allaircraftare
notinvolved.
freeforums.org/
current-events-
f8.html

He talks about John Buchanon's account of the Bush-Nazi connection, the CIA killing Bobby Kennedy, chemtrails...jesus, the list goes on and on.

I find it VERY INTERESTING that Alex Jones has John Buchanon in one of his films, I believe it was the 2004 film "Martial Law: Rise of the Police State"---talking about the Bush-Nazi connection.

Alex Jones talks about the government killing the Kennedy's, and chemtrails, and on and on and on----and Socrates on his other blog talks about and believes all this shit---and he has the balls to claim I'M paranoid and believe in conspiracy theories?? When he believes the EXACT SAME THING??

Can I not conclude that because Socrates blogs about Bush-Nazi connections and John Buchanon [who is affliated with Alex Jones], the CIA killing the Kennedy's and chemtrails, that he is a tin-foil hat-wearing conspiratorial fucknut like you claim Jones is???

Hmmmmmm????? Answers???? I'm listening.

Real Truth Online said...

Blumert's book is "fucking awful". Does everyone know why? Because an ANONYMOUS dipshit blogger that is TOO CHICKEN to reveal his REAL name SAYS it is "fucking awful"!!

I will be shocked if the total number of people who care what you [Mr. Anonymous] thinks totals ZERO.

the_last_name_left said...

I told you several things already.

The way he mentions his wife's views is completely unbelievable. And she sounds a wholly unbelievable character too.

It's so obviously a simple propaganda effort and reads as drearily and programmatically as any classic Nazi or Soviet rubbish.

It's dead. You know?

I've never had such a revolting impression from somebody's writing before. It makes my skin crawl.

socrates said...

Larry, using the phrase exact same is a sign of utter stupidity. Here's a tip. Google the word diction.

Dude, you link to complete conspiracy theory freak websites. I don't do that. Maybe I did a few times when first starting out, because there is a learning curve to learning the net. It's about time you learned it. You look completely unhinged with paranoia.

You also shouldn't expect people to debate with you too much, since you've shown when busted, you ignore the beatdown. You've been proven to be a latent homosexual. Deal with that. Get off the net, see a sex therapist, and then find the boyfriend of your dreams. Myself and TLNL are into women not men. But as leftier than thous we realise there is nothing wrong with gay people like yourself. Seek help, buddy.