In 1991, a newsletter asked, “Is David Duke’s new prominence, despite his losing the gubernatorial election, good for anti-big government forces?” The conclusion was that “our priority should be to take the anti-government, anti-tax, anti-crime, anti-welfare loafers, anti-race privilege, anti-foreign meddling message of Duke, and enclose it in a more consistent package of freedom.”Funny how Paul's supporters see conspiracy everywhere yet this sort of thing by their own candidate passes unnoticed as 'the usual stuff of politics'.
SOURCE
The Libertarian cabal? The Libertarian conspiracy? Oh no! Only other people conspire.....only other people build up networks.....etc. lol.
For anyone but themselves this stuff would be self-evident proof of malevolent conspiracy, but for the conspiracists supporting Paul it's all perfectly normal and absent the least possible whiff of anything sinister. Funny.
5 comments:
Hey TLNL, how's it going? Sorry to go off topic, but it looks like someone spoofed your email account and tried to get me to click onto something fishy.
y, think it's sorted.
Just noticed. Stupid thing.
Arpy knew ear. :D
Its a conspiracy socrates!!!
No way was I gonna click on it. It might have been harmless spam, but I wasn't gonna take the chance.
What I don't get is if they're gonna go to that trouble to spoof you, they might as well come up with something less obviously some sort of bullshite.
What I don't get is how they could hook up you to me? That's why I think it could be something beyond everyday spam.
Hey Larry!!!!! How the fock you doing, buddy? Lol.
Lol, I did your question mark schtick thingie subconsciously. You the man, TLNL.
Post a Comment