Rivero exposes himself over - - R - E -

At whatreallyhappened.com today:

THE JEWISH THIRD REICH
Tags:
* ISRAEL
* PALESTINE
The pornographic mass slaughter perpetrated by Israel in the Gaza Strip on Saturday, 27 December, once again reveals the Nazi nature of the Zionist state.

It also underscore the genocidal nature and brutal ugliness of the Zionist mentality, a mentality based on and shaped by murder, bullying, coercion, aggression, brutality and criminality.

Furthermore, it shows that Israel is capable, both mentally and physically, of carrying out a real holocaust against the Palestinian people and other peoples of the Middle East.

But what about Turkey? Why is it only Israeli aggression which reveals nazism at its heart?

One of the news reports I quoted in the last blog is from the BBC this weekend.

I find it astonishing that Israeli actions attract such condemnation and yet comparable Turkish actions receive almost no attention whatsoever. And certainly not shouts about nazism.

Another separate article featured by Rivero says the Turkish Prime Minister has criticised the Israelis. WRH quotes the article:

[And] among regional allies there was also discontent: The prime minister of Turkey, one of the few Muslim countries to have relations with Israel, called the air assault a "crime against humanity."

A crime against humanity? OK - but look where this is coming from? Turkey was itself bombing Kurds and carrying out ground operations along the Iraqi/Turkish border. The Turkish rationale is not so different from Israel's.

It is the BBC, not Rivero, reporting that,

Turkish fighter planes have bombed suspected Kurdish separatist positions in northern Iraq.

Turkish military sources said the attacks, which started late on Saturday (27th Dec 2008- same as Gaza), targeted members of the rebel Kurdistan Workers' Party (PKK).

There was no word on casualties. There has been no official comment from the Turkish armed forces on the raid.

Turkey has stepped up its cross-border operations into Iraq in recent months, amid mounting casualties on both sides.

Turkey has accused Iraq of failing to stop the PKK - who are fighting for greater autonomy in south-eastern Turkey - from using its northern areas as a safe haven.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/7802106.stm

It does seem remarkable that Turkey so escapes condemnation for comparable action to that for which Israel receives intense scrutiny, criticism and condemnation from almost every quarter.

It is Turkey which has escaped condemnation and scrutiny - not Israel.

Rivero and his anti-semitic friends have been silent about Turkey. For them Turkey's aggression fails to elicit the ugly memories of Nazism. Somehow for them, it is only Israeli murders that provoke comparison with Holocaust - and they always make the comparison.

So what about Turkey's aggression? It doesn't feature at WRH - not even when the PM of Turkey indulges in the rank hypocrisy of calling Israeli aggression "a crime against humanity" hours after Turkey had themselves bombed the PKK in Iraq.

According to the BBC:

The PKK - which is treated as a terrorist organisation by Turkey, the EU and US - has waged a violent campaign for Kurdish autonomy since 1984, resulting in more than 40,000 deaths.

40,000 deaths.

Earlier this year, 3rd May 2008, the BBC reported:

Turkish air strikes in northern Iraq this week left more than 150 Kurdish rebels dead, the Turkish army says.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/1/hi/world/middle_east/7382150.stm

29 February 2008, BBC reported:

...the Turkish military said at least 240 PKK militants had been killed since it launched its offensive just over a week ago. It added that 27 members of the Turkish security forces had also died.

"Both the start and end dates of the operation were decided by us solely based on military reasoning and necessities," it said.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/1/hi/world/europe/7270566.stm

And despite Turkey engaging in further airstrikes against Kurds, on the same day as Israel attacked Gaza, Rivero can't find a place to condemn the Turks for their their aggression - let alone does he condemn them for being a Turkish Reich.

But on today's WRH alone, there are 60 stories about Israel and Gaza. And not a mention of Turkey, apart from the PMs hypocrisy.

60 articles.

There are also 7 articles about "liar-jews" fabricating tales and memoirs of the holocaust.

Rivero asks

Are they ALl hoaxes?

The remaining few other articles are the usual whining about jews in banking - that's "economics" to Rivero and Curt Maynard.

So why such attention to Israeli aggression? Not hard to see why! Zero articles on Turkey, but 60 on Israel in Gaza. So how much longer must we put up with the pretense that Israel gets no such attention?

I wonder when I can expect to see Turkish aggression described as revealing the Nazi-heart of Turkish nationalism blah blah blah?

Rivero says of Israel, but not of Turkey - that

"The leaders of the world should, collectively,revoke the diplomatic credentials of every Israeli diplomat in their country and send them packing.

Otherwise, they are enablers to genocide."

Somehow that doesn't apply for anyone else? At least not for Turkey.

When will we see unpunished and ignored Turkish aggression given as 'proof' of Turkish "control over the White House and US foreign policy"?

It's not going to happen, and there's plenty of reasons why - anti-semitic conspiracism.

Here is Rivero commenting on the jewish Eli Wiesel's misfortune to have been robbed by Madoff. Rivero's all heart, eh?

Elie Wiesel operated a foundation that forced schools to include Holocaust Education on their curriculum. In a stunning ironic twist, Elie Wiesel's foundation had their endowments with Bernie Madoff, and has since collapsed.

Mike Rivero WRH Dec 28/08 11.49

How is it a "stunning twist"? How is it ironic? What does he mean? Is he saying he thinks it's funny? Deserved? What?

And interesting that anti-semitic conspiracism fails to account for how we have a supposedly super-powerful, jewish, holocaust-indoctrinator being robbed-blind by another supposedly super-powerful, jewish, financier. But they're all in on it together...........hmmm.

And Rivero doesn't fail to take the opportunity to again attack the memory of the holocaust. How Wiesel is supposed to have actually "forced" holocaust education onto schools' curricula remains a mystery.

And while Rivero simply asserts such nonsense, back in the real world:

On February 1, 2007, Wiesel was attacked in a San Francisco hotel by a twenty-two year old holocaust denier named Eric Hunt who tried to drag Wiesel into a hotel room. Wiesel was not injured and Hunt fled the scene. Later, Hunt bragged about the incident on a holocaust denial website.
....
Hunt was convicted on July 21, 2008, and he was sentenced to two years but was given credit for time served and good behavior and was released on probation and ordered to undergo psychological treatment. The jury convicted Hunt of three charges but dismissed the remaining charges of attempted kidnapping, stalking, and an additional count of false imprisonment, amid Hunt's withdrawal of his not guilty by reason of insanity plea.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elie_Wiesel

So to whom did Eric Hunt go bragging about assaulting Wiesel?

A quick google and it turns up that Hunt went bragging to some of Rivero's favourite "historians" - ones he's often linked to and whose holocaust denial he promotes and shares: Frederick Töben and the Adelaide Institute. Well, whaddya know? Small world?

Note from Fredrick Töben on the Eric Hunt-Elie Wiesel matter:

1. I know that Eric Hunt sent an email bragging about his exploits to Ziopedia's Andrew Winkler and to Adelaide Institute. Ziopedia ran the story but Adelaide Institute decided not to distribute it.
http://www.adelaideinstitute.org/LEGAL2006/Hunt.htm

Over at ZIOPEDIA we find

Alex Jones interview with Mike Rivero - 26 August 2008
Monday, 01 September 2008 17:27

Shock! Rivero's considered worthy of distribution over at Ziopedia. The Adelaide Institute says of ZIOPEDIA -

The article below specifically mentions the Hunt email appearing on a >>website for Holocaust deniers<<. To my knowledge Ziopedia is primarily an >anti-Semitic< website, but the logic of its thrust inevitably includes the >Holocaust<, which it fearlessly includes in its countless articles.
http://www.adelaideinstitute.org/LEGAL2006/Hunt.htm

Ziopedia also has some other articles - like the highly original

The Jewish Bankers Are at It Again

Murder in the Middle East - the world watches on.

There's a country that regularly invades its neighbours - to kill "terrorists".

Can you guess which country it IS?

It's called _ _ R _ E _.

The BBC reports that --R-E-'s army has killed more than 150 people:

"According to initial estimates, this operation allowed us to neutralise more than 150 terrorists," the army said in a statement on its website.

_ _ R _ E _ has staged several cross-border raids .....over the past few months in pursuit of the rebels.

_ _ R _ E _'s parliament authorised cross-border operations ...late last year.

And it's not as if this was the first time. This weekend's attacks reflect a pattern of such behaviour - off-screen murder.

The BBC reports incursions and aggression earlier in the year:

In February, _ _ R _ E _ launched a week-long ground offensive .....which, it said, targeted bases used by up to 3,000 rebels as a spring-board for attacks across the border.

_ _ R _ E _'s fighter planes have bombed suspected ... positions......_ _ R _ E _'s military sources said the attacks, which started late on Saturday, targeted........

_ _ R _ E _ has stepped up its cross-border operations in recent months, amid mounting casualties on both sides.


Whom but an American ally could get away with such behaviour?

And how does Bush respond to state-sponsored terror from such a close and crucial ally in the middle east?

The BBC reports the Bush government's response:

Mr Bush told a news conference, he said _ _ R _ E _ needed to "move quickly, achieve their objective and get out."

Mr Bush dismissed suggestions that _ _ R _ E _ should be threatened with the removal of American intelligence co-operation.

Mr Bush's comments followed an earlier statement by US Defence Secretary Robert Gates during a visit to _ _ R _ E _.

_ _ R _ E _'s incursion "should be as short and precisely targeted as possible", he said after talks with his _ _ R _ E _ counterpart in the capital.

So - have you guessed which country it is? _ _ R _ E _ ?

Another clue, perhaps??

It's the American and Western ally that has been bombing suspected "terrorists" this last weekend - through the Christian week of Christmas. And they somehow not only escape American condemnation, but also the attacks are treated as unimportant by the media, seemingly ignored by the UN, the European Union etc etc.

It's a country which proves over and over again that people can turn a blind eye to violence. It's a country that proves so much of western hipocrisy.

Guessed the name yet?

It's T U R K E Y.

What else were you thinking of?

rFactor Tutorial 1 - Installing Mods, Tracks, Cars.......

Most mods come in the form of .RAR files: compressed files, which need decompressing before they can be used with rFactor.

So, first of all, download and install WINRAR. Get it here.

--Download a mod. I'll use Legends Cars as an example.

--Save the download somewhere - on your desktop, for example.

--Create a new folder on your desktop - I'll call mine "temp mods".



--Open the RAR by double clicking it.

--Select all the files visible in the rar (CTRL-A), and click-drag them over to your new desktop folder (TEMP MODS in my example.)



--Once the RAR finishes extracting - closes the RAR - and open your rFactor installation folder. If you can't find the folder, find the shortcut you usually use to run rFactor, and right click it, select PROPERTIES and then click the button saying "FIND TARGET". The rFactor installation folder will open.

--Compare the two folders you now have open: the temp mods one, and the rFactor one.



--By comparing the two folders, we can see the folder structure of "temp mods" is repeated in the rFactor folder.

This is the crucial point - to find the right place in the rFactor folder for the mod folders.

In the example, we can see Legends Cars has 3 folders - GAMEDATA, RFM, and UIDATA. We can also see those folders in the rFactor folder. Hence, we have found the right place to put our mod files.

So select all the files in the TEMP MODS folder. Cut, or copy them all (CTRL-A, then CTRL-X to cut).

--Paste the files into the rFactor folder (CTRL-V).

You'll be asked if you want to overwite files etc - just answer "YES".



And that, is it.

Run rFactor - and Legends Cars will now be available in the game.

If you don't have enough money to buy a car, enter a race weekend, and in the chatbox, type ISI_BABYFACTORY, and press "ENTER". Quit the race, and your credits should go up to a few billion or so.

-----------------------------------

Often track mods don't have a full folder structure - you only get the track folder itself. For example, you open the RAR and get a folder called, ZOLDER.

In this case, you need to navigate to the right place in rFactor - and it's here:

rFACTOR--->GAMEDATA---->LOCATIONS---->

Use the same method as above for the Legend Mod, except make sure you paste the new track folder ZOLDER into the right place in the rFACTOR folder ie into the LOCATIONS folder, as shown below.

Here's the RAR file, which needs extracting into the TEMP MODS folder:



Close the RAR, and bring up the rFactor Install folder again. Find the right place in the rFactor folder ie rFACTOR-->GAMEDATA-->LOCATIONS

Cut and paste the Zolder folder into the LOCATIONS folder, as shown below.



And that's it.

Banned Again - by an "anti-fascist board" - Rigorous Intuition

Rig Int banned me. Apparently because I was a duplicate identity, or something.

I only ever posted there under one name - same as the one I use here, and at hraunfjord.org: the_last_name_left.

Anyone saying otherwise is simply a liar, or just simply plain wrong. I know the facts of my own actions, obviously. I can't see how or why anyone would spoof my IP address.

So what to make of another self-proclaimed "anti-fascist"/progressive board banning people without warning for spurious reasons?

Apparently I wasn't even banned for riding my hobby horse of warning about fascism's subversion of 911Troof. Yet - whilst I apparently wasn't banned for the content of my posts, there are posts about the banning which certainly do refer to what I'd said. Of course they completely misrepresent what I'd said.

I'm accused of inferring guilt by association, of employing the fallacy that "Nazis eat apples. Mr X eats apples. Mr X is a Nazi."

Of course I never made that argument. But that reductio absurdum of my argument is easier to deal with than the real ones, which ask things like "How much can someone share with Nazism before they must be considered 'a Nazi'."

Of course sharing a taste for apples is irrelevant.

Why are people on a supposedly "anti-fascist board" attacking and misrepresenting someone whom warns of fascism? Why does a self-proclaimed "anti-fascist" board so willingly accept banning people so groundlessly? Censorship is only an issue for "the powers that be", I suppose? When "the powers that be" do it, it's an infringement of civil liberty but when internet forums do it, it's the exercise of private property privilege - an expression of liberty. Yeah, right..... And somehow the advocates of private property miss this, when they complain about what Time, MSNBC, and other private media report. When mass media pursues its own interests it's called bias and censorship. What's it called when 911 Troof or "progressives" do it? The mass media is actually far more tolerant and reflective of diverse criticism than so much of the new-media, self-proclaiming their 'radicalism', anti-fascism or 'progressivism'.

I was accused of numerous things at RigInt, particularly of simplifying the issues and employing the fallacy of 'guilt by association'. And yet no comment was passed on the repeated posting of a picture of a red Hitler with a hammer and sickle armband. Not hard to see what the implication is - but somehow such propaganda cartoons aren't examples of 'guilt by association.' The communist Hitler cartoon drew no word of condemnation from the board at RigInt. Anti-fascist, or actually anti-communist? The poster believes they're the same thing - and RigInt is silent about it. So why doesn't RigInt claim to be "anti-communist", just as it claims to be "anti-fascist"? Because at RigInt, crude anti-communism elicits none of the ire that greets warnings of fascism within 911Troof. Why no criticism of simplicity for Hitler as a communist? Why no cries of 'guilt by association' over symbolising Hitler as "a red"?

Why is it tolerable that Hitler can be portrayed as a communist, and yet my efforts at warning about fascists posing as progressives are merely crude simplification and an effort at "guilt by association"?

And anyway - what is my banning at RigInt, if not an example of guilt by association? Who else am I suspected of being? who is it that so deserves banning, that the mere suspicion I am they, requires an immediate ban? (And no right of reply, of course.) And what should it matter if I was that person, anyway? I'm not, but so what? How does that matter?

A poster writes: "He's an old friend that's not welcome here. .."

Believe what you like, oh truthwarrior! If anyone on the planet knows the truth of the situation I do - and I am no-one's sockpuppet.

It reminds me of being banned from Progressive Independent after 2 posts. All I asked was "Who owns Progressive Independent?" - and I was banned. PI is registered to a proxy registrar, suggesting the real registrants want to retain their anonymity. Why?

PI is a self-proclaimed "progressive" and "leftist" forum - which keeps its ownership "anonymous". "full disclosure" it ain't - and they banned me for asking about it. They could have just pointed me to the facts, but instead chose to ban me. Odd behaviour for a progressive/leftist forum - dedicated to "finding the truth" blah blah blah. From my perspective, ownership is a crucial issue for lefties. Seems it is for PI too - only they prefer to keep their ownership 'anonymous'.

And like Rigorous Intuition, whilst there's claims to being "progressive" and "anti-fascist" at Progressive Independent, there's a dearth of actual anti-fascism or progressivism. Not surprising when you advertise for membership at Rivero's WRH, as PI has done. Such places as RI and PI can behave little differently to that what they claim to be in opposition to.

I checked the RigInt subject group-heading of "fascism". I found 6 entries for the entire year 2008. One thread was one of my own - which went unanswered, and another thread was a list of holocaust deniers, again, unanswered. Is that a fair measure of their "anti-fascism"? Or are instant bans and suppression the measure? Or maybe the measure is their use of false allegation absent a right of reply?

But even if RigInt were innocently simply plain wrong - and not maliciously and consciously deceitful - their behaviour still speaks volumes. Penguin the RigInt poster insisted one must judge people by what they DO. Apparently he never noticed that was the foundation of my criticisms.

I wouldn't labour the point, but my banning can be seen as vindicating my criticism. Amongst other things I criticised a dishonest attitude to evidence - and I'm now banned on the (entirely spurious) grounds of being an unwanted "old friend". I'm obviously very well-placed to judge such an assessment of any possible evidence, because I know what I do. Such a position affords me the knowledge that my criticism is vindicated.

Big deal. Keep your precious forum free from my dissent - it's your prerogative, isn't it, property owners?

The Perplexing World Of Alex Jones - Part 1

Alex Jones holds some very odd views. Some of his views are simply plain odd - but others are odd only when held in juxtaposition with other beliefs he professes to have. My bullshit detectors tingle when I see such oddness..

I find the following exchange particularly odd, and not a little insightful.

Alex ends up saying the Israeli "security fence" is "beautiful", and that he salivates over it....!

Here's Alex Jones [AJ], in conversation with his guest, Michael Shrimpton [MS]:

151. AJ: You were there with the IDF on the ground, what did you learn?

152. MS: Well I was very impressed with the way the IDF ran check-points. I talked to a check-point commander in Jenin, for example, very impressed with what I saw; very impressed with the security fence which is clearly having an impact in those sectors of the West Bank where it’s been erected.[Inaudible]

153. AJ: Well I know this. We sure need one of those on the southern border of the US.

154. MS: [Laughs]

155. AJ: And I want one. That thing’s beautiful.

156. MS: Well I think your southern border is a bit porous and as we’ve seen on 9/11, porous borders can present dangers. And er –

157. AJ: Well I’m not kidding, I’ve literally seen photos of that thing and I start salivating on it.

.......

162. MS: Well I’m a big fan of the IDF. I was very impressed meeting and talking with erm, from soldiers up to generals. I think the IDF are doing a good job. I think the Israelis know far more about counter-terrorism than we do in Britain or in the United States. My general line with Israel is I think, we in the west, the rest of the west – Israel is part of the west – we need to get off the Israelis’ back and let them go and do the job. They do know what they’re doing.

163. AJ: Well certainly they know how to build a fence and I wish we had one of those.

164. MS: [Laughs] The fence is very impressive. It’s more than a fence of course, it’s a, you’ve got a ditch, you’ve got a roadway that allows regular patrolling, easy access to any terrorist incursion, good surveillance, some good, high-tech stuff there. The security barrier is a very impressive development.
http://seanbryson.com/articles/dr_david_kelly_michael_shrimpton.html

Rivero - WhatReallyHappened.com : sycophants and censorship.

For a long time I've gotten sick of Mike Rivero's fascism.

And I'm sick of his sycophants too.

Rivero, and his sycophants love to make great claims about 'how much better than the mainstream' they are, when in reality, they are far worse.

Rivero is nothing less or more than a mouthpiece for fascist propaganda. Don't believe me? Hear the evidence and you will believe me.

But that's the problem - hearing the evidence at all. Who wants to hear it? Who amongst the faux critics of the now-reviled '911 troof movement' ever get to hear any of the evidence against their "heros"? Few do, because the so-called "alternative" news scene is full of charlatans intent on censoring the least criticism of their 'press darlings'.

And that criticism includes the charge that 911 Troof, and Rivero in particular, are agents of FASCISM. No small charge, I'm sure anyone would agree.

But that's exactly why Rivero, his minions, and the rest of the 911 Troof morons work so hard to prevent the charge and the evidence behind it becoming known.

I want to use this blog to at least put the evidence out there, starting with the most recent episode of censorship to protect Rivero's reputation from the TRUE charge that he is an agent of fascism - racism - neo-nazism.

I have had 28 (polite) posts deleted from desertpeace.wordpress.com within 24 hours. Why? Because I interrupted their eulogy to Mike Rivero and WRH.

Have a look:

http://desertpeace.wordpress.com/2008/07/16/in-appreciation-michael-rivero-what-really-happened/#comment-12470

I ended up counting how long it took for my comments to be deleted - 1 minute and 10 seconds.

Now, that's pretty sickeningly efficient censorship from people eulogising the HONESTY of fascist twerps like Mike Rivero. Desertpeace never even told their readers that they were censoring comments..........

For the record - here are the posts which were deleted with such efficiency. See if you can tell why they deserved such stringent censorship?

As each post gets submitted, the post number increases. My first post appeared on the site as as comment 7.

the_last_name_left said,

July 16, 2008 at 3:57 pm

Shame he gives such support to fascists.

Wonder why you didn’t mention that in your glowing tribute? Same reasons as you’ll not publish this comment I suppose.

Why has Rivero given such support to racist horrors like Curt Maynard? Why did he promote the “no More Wars for Israel” conference but never once mentioned the conference was backed by fascists, racists, holocaust deniers, and white nationalists?

Eileen Fleming who did speak at the conference says she was appalled to find out fascists were speaking at the conference. She claims she’d never have gone if she’d known. She felt USED. But Rivero DID know exactly who was going - he promoted the conference through Curt Maynard.

And when people protested the fascist basis of that conference, did Rivero once tell his readers and listeners that the protests were ANTI-FASCIST ones? No. That’s called protecting fascism - promoting fascism.

SO spare me the codswallop about Rivero and truth, please?

To check Rivero’s commitment to truth, why not ask him why he still claims “Sharon bragged “We the jews control america”"????

Rivero knows the quote is fabricated - he knows the only “source” of the quote is an Islamic palestinian group. But he still uses the quote, as if it were true. He’s never even admitted the quote was flatly denied by the broadcaster claimed responsible.

Hardly fits with your portrait, does it?

So why don’t you show your own commitment to TRUTH, HONESTY and freedom of speech, and leave my comments stand? Or are you going to join Rivero and his fascist friends by following them into hypocrisy?

That was deleted very quickly. Seeing it deleted, I posted again:

the_last_name_left said,

July 16, 2008 at 4:20 pm

comment 7 should read

#

#
the_last_name_left said,

July 16, 2008 at 3:57 pm

Shame he gives such support to fascists.

Wonder why you didn’t mention that in your glowing tribute? Same reasons as you’ll not publish this comment I suppose.

Why has Rivero given such support to racist horrors like Curt Maynard? Why did he promote the “no More Wars for Israel” conference but never once mentioned the conference was backed by fascists, racists, holocaust deniers, and white nationalists?

Eileen Fleming who did speak at the conference says she was appalled to find out fascists were speaking at the conference. She claims she’d never have gone if she’d known. She felt USED. But Rivero DID know exactly who was going - he promoted the conference through Curt Maynard.

And when people protested the fascist basis of that conference, did Rivero once tell his readers and listeners that the protests were ANTI-FASCIST ones? No. That’s called protecting fascism - promoting fascism.

SO spare me the codswallop about Rivero and truth, please?

To check Rivero’s commitment to truth, why not ask him why he still claims “Sharon bragged “We the jews control america””????

Rivero knows the quote is fabricated - he knows the only “source” of the quote is an Islamic palestinian group. But he still uses the quote, as if it were true. He’s never even admitted the quote was flatly denied by the broadcaster claimed responsible.

Hardly fits with your portrait, does it?

So why don’t you show your own commitment to TRUTH, HONESTY and freedom of speech, and leave my comments stand? Or are you going to join Rivero and his fascist friends by following them into hypocrisy?
————————————–

But as this site CENSORS without even telling its readers that it does so, the article above about Rivero’s TRUTH and HONESTY is simlpy the deepest hypocrisy. Shame on you.

I posted again, this time at post number 8.

the_last_name_left said,

July 16, 2008 at 4:21 pm

How long before you delete the comment this time?

the answer was - not very long. It was quickly deleted.

So I posted again - back at number 7 position, again.

the_last_name_left said,

July 16, 2008 at 4:26 pm

you are shameless.

You write this self-congratulating propaganda piece eulogising Rivero’s honesty - but delete TRUE evidence of Rivero’s connections with fascism.

Wow - you really are shameless, mr deleter.

Again that was deleted. That was the 4th comment of mine deleted in 30 minutes.

So I tried again, and yet again my comment appeared as 'comment 7':

the_last_name_left said,

July 16, 2008 at 4:30 pm

shameful.

Again, that was deleted, so I again posted, again at number 7:

the_last_name_left said,

July 16, 2008 at 4:33 pm

you are very efficient censors, aren’t you?

And censoring to protect fascism, eh? How commendable?

After that was deleted, I thought I'd try a different tack, and just post a URL about Rivero's work for fascism. This entry was now at number 8. Somebody else had posted something sycophantic - so that comment was allowed.

the_last_name_left said,

July 16, 2008 at 4:36 pm

http://h-files.hraunfjord.org/last_name/wrh/

And I added another post - this time we were up to number 9.

the_last_name_left said,

July 16, 2008 at 4:40 pm

Readers should know this blogger censors comments - without admitting it to you, his dear, dear readers. Such respect…….

This blog censors to support the cause of fascism - neo-nazism - racism - white nationalism - elitism.

Those two posts were deleted, so we were back down to 8 comments again. So I posted again:

the_last_name_left said,

July 16, 2008 at 4:43 pm

http://h-files.hraunfjord.org/last_name/wrh/

Again the "troofseekers" deleted it. Efficient censors, aren't they?

Tiring of this, I just reposted what was still in my browser........

the_last_name_left said,

July 16, 2008 at 4:43 pm

the_last_name_left said,

July 16, 2008 at 4:40 pm

Readers should know this blogger censors comments - without admitting it to you, his dear, dear readers. Such respect…….

This blog censors to support the cause of fascism - neo-nazism - racism - white nationalism - elitism.

Again they deleted it. Surprised yet?

Having deleted the comment, we were again back to only 7 comments on the article.

So again I posted as comment 8:

the_last_name_left said,

July 16, 2008 at 4:49 pm

some comments are missing mr blogger…………not exactly evidence of a commitment to TRUTH and HONESTY is it, mr hypocrite-blogger.

That was duly deleted, so again I posted as comment 8

the_last_name_left said,

July 16, 2008 at 4:51 pm

[quote]only articles of actual importance to the lives of real (non-brainwashed) people.[/quote]

haha. And I suppose deleting my comments here is helping break people out of their brainwashing eh?

Man, you are such sick hypocrites.

And again, this time at number 9!!!!

the_last_name_left said,

July 16, 2008 at 4:55 pm

WRH is great - puts you in touch with racist propaganda from people like Curt Maynard!

http://h-files.hraunfjord.org/last_name/wrh/

Yes, yes - that was deleted again. So were back to only 7 comments on the page, and no mention that the blogger was deleting comments as fast as they were made.

So I tried again:

the_last_name_left said,

July 16, 2008 at 5:25 pm

Do the readers know that that anything written praising Rivero insufficiently will be *C E N S O R E D*?

It only takes a moment, and WHOOOSH! Down the memory hole it goes……

Having tired of this, I took a break, before posting

the_last_name_left said,

July 17, 2008 at 4:35 am

This blog claims to be against racism.

But yet this blog also publishes eulogy to Rivero and Whatreallyhappened!

Rivero promotes fascism - racism - anti-semitism - neo-nazism.

And to prevent it being known this blog censored by comments 18 times in one hour.

This blog therefore ALSO supports racism, fascism, anti-semitism and even neo-nazism - for that is what it is protecting when it shields its readers from FAIR COMMENT that Mike Rivero is in bed with racist fascists like Curt Maynard.

Why not deal with the issue, if you “welcome debate” as claimed on this website?

How can you claim to be against racism whilst deleting my polite ANTI-RACIST and ANTI-FASCIST comments? Your censorship of anti-racism betrays your claims to be useless hot-air……hypocrisy.

Have the debate? OR are you too scared to? You know you will lose - because you ALREADY must KNOW Rivero actually supports fascism and racism. That’s why you refuse the debate - and just censor………

Guess what happened? You'll never guess! It was deleted!? Surprised?

I was getting pretty tired of this, especially as by now we had got up to 25 sycophantic comments saying "rivero's so cool - he gives us all the facts" and other similar CRAP. So I posted again:

the_last_name_left said,

July 17, 2008 at 4:58 am

This blog claims to be against racism.

But yet this blog also publishes eulogy to Rivero and Whatreallyhappened!

Rivero promotes fascism - racism - anti-semitism - neo-nazism.

And to prevent it being known this blog censored by comments 18 times in one hour.

This blog therefore ALSO supports racism, fascism, anti-semitism and even neo-nazism - for that is what it is protecting when it shields its readers from FAIR COMMENT that Mike Rivero is in bed with racist fascists like Curt Maynard.

Why not deal with the issue, if you “welcome debate” as claimed on this website?

How can you claim to be against racism whilst deleting my polite ANTI-RACIST and ANTI-FASCIST comments? Your censorship of anti-racism betrays your claims to be useless hot-air……hypocrisy.

Have the debate? OR are you too scared to? You know you will lose - because you ALREADY must KNOW Rivero actually supports fascism and racism. That’s why you refuse the debate - and just censor………

Again - within 10 minutes my comment was deleted.

Not one to give up easily, I decided to post again - by now we were up to 26 sycophantic posts - and my deleted posts were approaching the same number. So I had to try something different - I thought I'd post something sycophantic, but with a message......to see if my somewhat cryptic (but really pretty blatant) anti-semitism
would survive the censors knife.......shock horror! - it did! I posted:

Patriot Pete said,

July 17, 2008 at 9:45 am

Wahayy for WRH and Mike Rivero!

Where else can we get such crucial info on the takeover of our country? Where else can we find such timely info on the cabal that is trying to take over the world?

Rivero puts the whole thing together - neocons, bankers, globalist - and most importantly zionism, all of which threaten traditional american and european values. We know what you mean, mikey!

WE KNOW WHAT YOU MEAN. FASCISM. ANTI-SEMITISM. NEO-NAZISM. OH YES, MIKEY BOY _ WE REALLY DO KNOW YOUR GAME. You filthy little racist prick.

Encouraged, I thought I'd add something a little more to the point, and something which might be a little tricky for a hard-pressed censor to recognise........

InitialD said,

July 17, 2008 at 1:38 pm

Love rivero - he’s

Radical
Atheist
Caring
Intelligent
Sensitive
Technological

You see those initials I'd written - they spell RACIST, right?

As that post survived for more than 10 minutes I gave it another go, this time spelling something else out for the cretinous sycophants:

InitialD said,

July 17, 2008 at 1:45 pm

oh and he’s

F - funny
A - artistic
S - serious
C - cutting
I - intellectual
S - supercillious
T - tenacious

Rivero works for FASCISM. Read the links above if you doubt it. Future posts will pursue this important point of fascist infiltration and exploitation of 911, amongst other things.

War for Israel - Fallacy Number One

I get tired of hearing the War in Iraq was "for Israel."

It seems like complete nonsense to me: I suspect it is largely driven by anti-semitism and the more common lack of appreciation for materialism (as in Marx's Historical Materialism).

So, here's the first in a series about the fallacies associated with the idea that War in Iraq was about anything other than American material interests.

Here's IHR's rationale for the war:

......the crucial factor in President Bush’s decision to attack was to help Israel. With support from Israel and America’s Jewish-Zionist lobby, and prodded by Jewish “neo-conservatives” holding high-level positions in his administration, President Bush – who was already fervently com­mitted to Israel – resolved to invade and subdue one of Israel’s chief regional enemies.
http://www.ihr.org/leaflets/iraqwar.shtml

And here's David Duke's take on the reasons behind The War in Iraq. He cites the oft-mentioned report "A Clean Break", saying:

The report basically argues how destruction of Iraq will protect Israel’s monopoly of nuclear weapons and give Israel a free hand to defeat the Palestinians and impose whatever colonial settlement Israel has in store.
http://www.davidduke.com/general/no-war-for-israel_4.html

And this is nowarforisrael.com's take on the reason for the war:

In a lengthy article in The American Conservative criticizing the rationale for the projected U.S. attack on Iraq, the veteran diplomatic historian Paul W. Schroeder noted (only in passing) "what is possibly the unacknowledged real reason and motive behind the policy — security for Israel." http://www.thornwalker.com/ditch/snieg_conc1.htm

I could go on and post endless variations on this theme. Suffice to say the claim about "War for Israel" is predicated upon ideas about neutralising Israel's enemies.

However, such claims forget one thing - that Iraq had no WMD, and was *not* a threat to Israel (or anyone else).

Even the IHR article quoted above claiming it was "War for Israel" admits:

As the world now knows, Iraq had no dangerous “weapons of mass destruction,” and posed no threat to the US. Moreover, alarmist suggestions that the Baghdad regime was working with the al-Qaeda terror network likewise proved to be without foundation.

So if the official reasons given for the war were untrue, why did the United States attack Iraq?
http://www.ihr.org/leaflets/iraqwar.shtml

So, the fallacy is clear - if Iraq is acknowledged to not have been a threat to Israel - it cannot then be argued that Israel manipulated USA into war to remove such a 'threat to Israel'.

The "It's Israel!" crowd want it both ways here: they seek to blame Israel for pushing false intelligence on USA (they claim Israel gave false intel to US because they knew Iraq had no WMD) , and yet the supposed rationale for this deceit was an effort to draw USA into taking out one of Israel's regional enemies.

But if Israel really was dishonestly manipulating USA with trumped up evidence, then they must have known Iraq was no threat - else they weren't being dishonest. But in that case, why the Israeli need to manipulate USA into removing Israel's (toothless) enemy anyway as they knew Iraq was no threat!?