tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2904940198922843174.post1217954329808156559..comments2024-01-03T08:31:24.554+00:00Comments on the_last_blog_left: Trotsky on Fascismthe_last_name_lefthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12276770064991215910noreply@blogger.comBlogger8125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2904940198922843174.post-55340280490351679642009-08-10T10:19:25.185+01:002009-08-10T10:19:25.185+01:00Destroyed me? No - you're just recycling the...Destroyed me? No - you're just recycling the same crap - and not particularly concisely either.<br /><br />Are you an architect Larry?<br /><br />Still haven't answered, have you? <br /><br />What's your alternative explanation for WTC7 and WTC1+2? <br /><br />Still haven't answered, have you, Larry?<br /><br /><i><b>You are not allowed to post on MY blog anymore since you censor YOUR blog.</b></i><br /><br />LOL - I prevent you posting absolute rubbish, irrelvancies, insults etc - yes.<br /><br />I have no reason to fear any of your "arguments". I can't even think of a reason I might.<br /><br />And as I said - I am happy to publish whatever you write - so long as it is relevant and so long as it isn't full of your usual bile.<br /><br />I don't mind criticism, and I don't mind people disagreeing with me.<br /><br />You however deleted my civil and relevant replies (note the PLURAL) - and now you're refusing to allow my civil and relevant comments at your blog. So - not an eye for an eye, Larry. But why would I expect you to be "fair" - you don't even answer simple questions - just rattle on with your tedious "assertions" which are only your (non-expert) opinion.<br /><br />You just can't take anyone believing differently, can you? And you just can't answer what is asked of you. And you can't assess evidence objectively.....etc.the_last_name_lefthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12276770064991215910noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2904940198922843174.post-2039025307470354062009-08-09T23:45:28.574+01:002009-08-09T23:45:28.574+01:00I KNEW you wouldnt post my last comments, because ...I KNEW you wouldnt post my last comments, because they DESTROYED you. You are a pathetic excuse for a human being. Im done wasting my time with you.<br /><br />You are not allowed to post on MY blog anymore since you censor YOUR blog. BUT, I am STILL not enabling comment moderation. I do NOT punish everyone for the actions of ONE asshole...BUT if I cant post on yours, you do NOT post on mine. Thats not censorship---that's an eye for an eye.Larrynoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2904940198922843174.post-34282581104417864552009-08-09T00:00:23.790+01:002009-08-09T00:00:23.790+01:00L: Yet you ENABLED COMMENT MODERATION ON YOUR BLOG...<i><b>L: Yet you ENABLED COMMENT MODERATION ON YOUR BLOG in order to silence me because I was crushing you with facts. AND you keep IGNORING certain point I make (McCormick Center) and IM fascist??</b></i><br /><br />No, I enabled comment moderation because you spam irrelevancies, you refuse to answer simple questions, and use foul language.<br /><br />I made that clear already.<br /><br /><i><b>L:You just described YOU. YOU censored your blog, NOT ME. YOU ignore my comments about the McCormick Center REPEATEDLY, so YOU are the one who doesnt address the issues!</b></i><br /><br />I've re-enabled moderation moderation because you immediately start spamming irrelevancies.<br /><br />There is NO building exactly like the WTC7 that has suffered similar damage and collapsed - correct.<br /><br />There is also no building exactly like the WTC that suffered similar damage and did NOT collapse. That is what you miss.<br /><br /><i><b>L: So, youre an architect??</b></i><br /><br />HA - I am listening to REAL architects, Larry.<br /><br />You refuse to answer if you are an architect - over and over - you refuse to answer that question.<br /><br />I'm not an architect - I happily admit. To you that undermines my understanding of what REAL architects and physics professors tell me. Fine.<br /><br />But you refuse to answer if you even are an architect! <br /><br />And - crucially - somehow your not being an architect is irrelevant to your own assertions about the dynamics of building collapse.<br /><br />That's a patently flawed method, Larry. And you're just spamming the same crap again, though your language has improved a little, well done. Clearly you DO KNOW what you're doing. When you can sort out where to post things of relevance, moderation will disappear again.the_last_name_lefthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12276770064991215910noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2904940198922843174.post-47858100451713408622009-08-08T23:10:49.163+01:002009-08-08T23:10:49.163+01:00where did I admit there's not much difference?...where did I admit there's not much difference? <br /><br />I don't believe there is no difference - it's all the difference in the world.<br /><br />You misunderstand my position. People who say there is no left/right are deluded, or liars. Only people who say it are "right wingers".the_last_name_lefthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12276770064991215910noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2904940198922843174.post-42169542744410179272009-08-08T23:10:43.409+01:002009-08-08T23:10:43.409+01:00By the way, if you claim yo possess the truth, why...By the way, if you claim yo possess the truth, why do you keep using the exact same dodge and deflect and spin tactics Ive seen from so many? How many times now have I asked you to provide me a picture of a building that suffered universal collapse that had just fires and damage AFTER you incorrectly said the McCormick Center was such an example (which its not)? How many times--like 15 now? And yet you CONTINUALLY ignore it--why is that? You purposely ignore that because Im wrong and youre right? If truth is on YOUR side, then give me the answer Im asking for and stop IGNORING it. <br /><br />I find it hilarious you said:<br /><br />"The simplest test is to simply try putting the issue of fascist infiltration to troofers - and watch them delete it, over and over again."<br /><br />Yet you ENABLED COMMENT MODERATION ON YOUR BLOG in order to silence me because I was crushing you with facts. AND you keep IGNORING certain point I make (McCormick Center) and IM fascist??<br /><br />THEN you said:<br /><br />"If 911 Truth was a genuine movement, it would be eager to address the issues - and to expell the fascist elements - but it doesn't - it resists even acknoeledging the problem."<br /><br />You just described YOU. YOU censored your blog, NOT ME. YOU ignore my comments about the McCormick Center REPEATEDLY, so YOU are the one who doesnt address the issues!<br /><br />You laughingly said:<br /><br />"Progressively though more evidence has been provided - I have become convinced that I was ignorant of how tall buildings behave and collapse - and I became aware of how prevalent far-right extremists and their insidious methods and ideology were operating behind the scenes in 911 conspiracy."<br /><br />So, youre an architect?? You were "ignorant of how tall buildings behave and collapse.."---now youre an EXPERT? Youre such an expert that you dont even know what a UNIVERSAL collapse is, since you sent me a link (although invalid) of the McCormick Center to PROVE WTC 7 was not the first to suffer such a fate, yet the McCormick Center was NOT a universal collapse!! It appears nothing has changed---you are STILL ignorant of how tall buildings behave and collapse!Larrynoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2904940198922843174.post-84823033268265180992009-08-08T22:59:51.602+01:002009-08-08T22:59:51.602+01:00If you had one iota of intelligence, you would see...If you had one iota of intelligence, you would see the fraud of the right/left paradigm. Youve eve ADMITTED that is hardly a difference------RIGHT, because it doesnt EXIST! I only mention the terms "right wing" an "left wing" in my stories so people can understand that Im talking about the people who CALL THEMSELVES that. Its like when certain Republicans all themselves "Republicans" but theyre really NOT Republicans (theyre Neo-cons), but I still use the term so people can know thats who Im talking about. You admitted in one of your posts that there's not much difference---I agree, but its because it doesnt exist. Its an illusion used to divide and conquer and to play one crowd versus the other---thats it.Larrynoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2904940198922843174.post-54383357572561524212009-08-08T19:39:58.331+01:002009-08-08T19:39:58.331+01:00This is completely irrelevant to the thread, Larry...This is completely irrelevant to the thread, Larry.<br /><br />But, to answer the points, yes I'm leftwing. I'm completely open about that. <br /><br />Was I a Troofer? No. I'll explain:<br /><br />Immediately following 911, there were a lot of questions, which needed answers, and there was a dearth of answers. (Obviously, because evidence isn't marshalled immediately.) I certainly did become convinced that 911 was a conspiracy - I didn't believe the towers could have fallen like that.....there seemed so many holes in the story, PNAC, Full Spectrum Dominance, the War on Terror kicking off, etc etc.<br /><br />I'd always loathed Bushco and American Imperialism and militarism, so it wasn't much of a leap. <br /><br />Progressively though more evidence has been provided - I have become convinced that I was ignorant of how tall buildings behave and collapse - and I became aware of how prevalent far-right extremists and their insidious methods and ideology were operating behind the scenes in 911 conspiracy. Reassessing the evidence led me to reject what I had been led to believe - *note* - I HAD BEEN LED TO BELIEVE things which were simply not true. I had been misled by (what turns out to be) elements of the far-right, pursuing their own agenda. I found the presence of the far-right had had a very corrosive effect on 911Truth - and was largely responsible for it becoming TROOF.<br /><br />I don't feel any shame in having changed my mind. And I certainly don't feel any shame in having rejected the far-right extremism which permeates 911Troof - or in distancing myself from it, and opposing it.<br /><br />I don't mind people disagreeing with me - but what I find reprehensible is that the leaders of 911 Troof deny and purposefully obscure their very close affiliations with the extreme, racist, fascist far-right. <br /><br />I retraced my footsteps through my journey in 911truth - and discovered almost the entirety of what I believed was sourced within the far-right. But the thing is, it was never clearly identified as being from the far-right - indeed, every effort was being made to deny such provenance.<br /><br />I just so happen to have had a longtime interest in Nazi Germany, Nazism, socialism etc - and that background proved useful to decode the methods being used by fascism to infiltrate and propagandise through 911 Troof. You can perhaps my horror when I discovered organised fascism was actually operating clandestinely behind 911 Troof, and why I was so disturbed to see Troofers increasingly adopting the language, tactics and ideology of fascism. <br /><br />Make no mistake - it is there. And that explains why holocaust denial has become so popular within 911 Troof, and why 911 Troof employs identical fallacies and tactics of holocaust denial; it explains the growing anti-semitism in 911 troof; the crossover of fascism and 911Troofers; etc etc etc.<br /><br />The simplest test is to simply try putting the issue of fascist infiltration to troofers - and watch them delete it, over and over again. <br /><br />If 911 Truth was a genuine movement, it would be eager to address the issues - and to expell the fascist elements - but it doesn't - it resists even acknoeledging the problem. So, imo 911 troof can't address the issue, because the two are now inseparable. Hence TROOF, rather than TRUTH.the_last_name_lefthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12276770064991215910noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2904940198922843174.post-16991076197345086002009-08-08T18:51:36.842+01:002009-08-08T18:51:36.842+01:00You USED TO BE A TROOFER---so you must have been R...You USED TO BE A TROOFER---so you must have been RIGHT wing, huh?? Plus, your blog is called, the Last Blog LEFT----hmmmm, left WING maybe?????<br /><br />LOLLarrynoreply@blogger.com